روان‌شناسی فرهنگی

روان‌شناسی فرهنگی

تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی و تغییرناپذیری جنسیتی مقیاس تجدیدنظر شده حس شایستگی ارتباطی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مشاوره، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
2 گروه برنامه ریزی درسی ، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی ، دانشگاه خوارزمی ، تهران ، ایران
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر مطالعه ساختار عاملی، تغییرناپذیری و قابلیت انطباق‌پذیری مقیاس تجدیدنظر شده حس شایستگی ارتباطی در جامعه ایران بود. این پژوهش بر اساس هدف کاربردی و از نظر تحلیل داده همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این مطالعه شامل تمام معلمان متأهل استان زنجان در سال 1400-1401 بود که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس داده‌های این پژوهش را با تکمیل کردن مقیاس حس شایستگی ارتباطی و چند مقیاس دیگر تأمین کردند. یافته‌های این مطالعه حاکی از ساختار دوعاملی این مقیاس بود. نتایج نشان دادند که اکثر گویه‌ها به‌جز دو گویه با مدل پاسخ مدرج برازش داشتند و گویه‌های حس شایستگی مفرط نسبت به گویه‌های حس شایستگی محدودشده متجانس‌تر بودند. یافته‌ها حکایت از پایایی مطلوب این مقیاس داشتند. شاخص‌های برازش در کل نمونه و زیرگروه‌ها مطلوب بودند. شاخص AVE در هر دو عامل خصوصاً حس شایستگی محدودشده چندان مطلوب نبود. محاسبه روایی تشخیصی با روش‌های متفاوت حاکی از برقراری آن در سطح هر دو عامل بود. تغییرناپذیری جنسیتی برای این ابزار تأیید شد. با توجه به ضرایب همبستگی بین این سازه و دیگر متغیرهای موردمطالعه، روایی همگرا و واگرای این مقیاس نیز تأیید شد. با توجه به یافته‌های این مطالعه می‌توان گفت که مقیاس تجدیدنظر شده حس شایستگی ارتباطی از ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مطلوبی جهت کاربرد در پژوهش‌های آتی برخوردار است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Determining the Psychometric Properties and Gender Invariance of The Sense of Relational Entitlement Scale -Revised (SRE-R)

نویسندگان English

Manouchehr Rezaee 1
Belal Izanloo 2
Naser Abbasi 1
1 Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of, Curriculum Planning , Faculty of Psychology and Educational sciences, Kharazmi University Tehran Iran
چکیده English

The aim of the present study was to study the factor structure, invariance and adaptability of The Sense of Relational Entitlement Scale-Revised (SRE-R) in Iranian society. This research was practical based on the purpose and correlational in terms of data analysis. The statistical population of this study included all married teachers in Zanjan province in 2022 that using the convenience sampling method provided the data of this research by completing The Sense of Relational Entitlement-Revised measure and some other scales. The findings of this study indicated a two-factor structure in this scale. The results showed that most of the items, except for two items, had fit with the graded response model and the items of the inflated sense of entitlement were more homogeneous than the restricted sense of entitlement items. The findings demonstrated the appropriate reliability of this scale. The fit indices were optimized in the whole sample and subgroups. The AVE index was not very proper in both factors, especially in the restricted sense of entitlement. The calculation of discriminant validity with different methods indicated its establishment at the level of the both factors. Gender invariance was confirmed for this measure. According to the correlation coefficients between this construct and other studied variables, the convergent and divergent validity of this scale was confirmed too. Given to the findings of the present study, it can be said that The Sense of Relational Entitlement-Revised has optimal psychometric properties for use in the future researches.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

The Sense of Relational Entitlement
Couple Relationship
Validation
Exploratory Graph Analysis
Invariance
Graded Response Model
Bar-Kalifa, E., Bar-Kalifa, L., Rafaeli, E., George-Levi, S., & Vilchinsky, N. (2016), ʻRelational entitlement moderates the associations between support matching and perceived partner responsiveness.ʼ Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 1-10.
Billow, R. M. (1999b), ʻPower and entitlement: Or, mine versus yours.ʼ Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 35(3), 473-489.
Billow, R. M. (1999a). ʻAn intersubjective approach to entitlement.ʼ The Psychoanalytic Quarterly68(3), 441-461.
Blechner, M. J. (1987), ʻEntitlement and narcissism: Paradise sought.ʼ Contemporary Psychoanalysis23(2), 244-255.
Brenner, I., Bachner-Melman, R., Lev-Ari, L., Levi-Ogolnic, M., Tolmacz, R., & Ben-Amitay, G. (2019), ʻAttachment, sense of entitlement in romantic relationships, and sexual revictimization among adult CSA survivors.ʼ Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19-20), NP10720-NP10743.
Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004), ʻPsychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure.ʼ Journal of personality assessment, 83(1), 29-45.
Candel OS and Turliuc MN (2021), ʻThe Role of Relational Entitlement, Self-Disclosure and Perceived Partner Responsiveness in Predicting Couple Satisfaction: A Daily-Diary Study.ʼ Front. Psychol. 12:609232.
Candel, O. S. (2018), ʻSense of Relational Entitlement–Romanian version. Factor structure and associations with romantic attachment and dyadic satisfaction.ʼ In Proceedings of CIEA 2018 the fifth international conference on adult education education for values–continuity and context (pp. 79-86).
Candel, O. S., & Turliuc, M. N. (2019), ʻThe effect of the sense of relational entitlement on relational satisfaction, positive and negative emotions.ʼ Journal of Psychological & Educational Research27(1), 46-60.
Chakir, R., and Feldman, D. (2020), Sense of relational Entitlement among elderly people toward their children. Ph.D. thesis. Herzliya: Interdisciplinary Center.
Chalmers, R. P. (2012), ʻMirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment.ʼ Journal of Statistical Software48 (6), 1-29.
Crasta, D., Rogge, R. D., Maniaci, M. R., & Reis, H. T. (2021), ʻToward an optimized measure of perceived partner responsiveness: Development and validation of the perceived responsiveness and insensitivity scale.ʼ Psychological Assessment33(4), 338.
Efrati, Y., Gerber, Z., & Tolmacz, R. (2019), ʻThe Relation of Intra-Psychic and Relational Aspects of the Self to Compulsive Sexual Behavior.ʼ Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 45(7), 618-631.
Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K., and Finkel, E. J. (2004), ʻToo proud to let go: narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness.ʼ J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 894-912.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981), ʻEvaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.ʼ Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
George-Levi, S., Vilchinsky, N., Tolmacz, R., and Liberman, G. (2014), ʻTesting the Concept of Relational Entitlement in the Dyadic Context: Further Validation and Associations with Relationship Satisfaction.ʼ J. Fam. Psychol. 28, 193-203.
Golino, H., & Christensen, A. P. (2022), EGAnet: Exploratory Graph Analysis - A framework for estimating the number of dimensions in multivariate data using network psychometrics. R package version 1.0.1.
Hannawa, A. F., Spitzberg, B. H., Wiering, L., & Teranishi, C. (2006), ʻIf I can’t have you, no one ca”: Development of a Relational Entitlement and Proprietariness Scale (REPS).ʼ Violence and Victims, 21(5), 539-560.
Kimmes, J. G., Jaurequi, M. E., May, R. W., Srivastava, S., & Fincham, F. D. (2018), ʻMindfulness in the context of romantic relationships: Initial development and validation of the Relationship Mindfulness Measure.ʼ Journal of Marital and Family Therapy44(4), 575-589.
Lam, L. W. (2012), ʻImpact of Competitiveness on Salespeople's Commitment and Performance.ʼ Journal of Business Research, 65 (9), 1328-1334.
Leiman, R. (2020). The Relationships Between Attachment Orientations, Forms of Concern and Quality Measures of Romantic Relationships. Ph.D. thesis. Herzliya: Interdisciplinary Center.
Moses, R, & Moses-Hrushovski, R. (1990), ʻReflections on the Sense of Entitlement.ʼ The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 45 (1), 61-78.
Nicholas Williams, D., Smith, D. B., Sukach, T., & Minaiy, C. (2018), ʻExpecting More in Relationships–Implications of Relational Entitlement.ʼ American Journal of Family Therapy, 46(4), 321-340.
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016), My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in human behavior54, 134-141.
Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022), ʻAn Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity.ʼ Organizational Research Methods, 25 (1), 6-14.
Rosseel, Y. (2012), ʻLavaan: An R package for Structural Equation Modeling and More.ʼ Journal of statistical software, 48(2), 1-36.
Sanchez, L., & Gager, C. T. (2000), ʻHard Living, Perceived Entitlement to a Great Marriage, and Marital Dissolution.ʼ Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 708-722.
Sanri, Ç., Halford, W. K., Rogge, R. D., & von Hippel, W. (2021), ʻThe Couple Flourishing Measure.ʼ Family Process, 60 (2), 457-476.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015), A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. psychology press.
Shadach, E., Rappaport, S., Dollberg, D., Tolmacz, R., & Levy, S. (2018), ʻRelational Entitlement, Early Recollections of Parental Care, and Attachment Orientation.ʼ Current Psychology, 37 (4), 781-791.
Shavit, Y., and Tolmacz, R. (2014), ʻPathological Concern: Scale Construction, Construct Validity, and associations with attachment, self-cohesion, and relational entitlement.ʼ Psychoanal. Psychol. 31, 343-356.
Tolmacz R, Lev-Ari L and Bachner-Melman R (2021), ʻRefining the Assessment of Entitlement in Romantic Relationships: The Sense of Relational Entitlement Scale-Revised (SRE-R).ʼ Front. Psychol. 12: 744618.
Tolmacz, R., & Mikulincer, M. (2011), ʻThe sense of entitlement in romantic relationships-Scale construction, factor structure, construct validity, and its associations with Attachment Orientations.ʼ Psychoanalytic Psychology, 28(1), 75-94.
Tolmacz, R., Bachner-Melman, R., Lev-Ari, L., & Almagor, K. (2022), ʻInterparental conflict and relational attitudes within romantic relationships: The mediating role of attachment orientations.ʼ Journal of Social and Personal Relationships39(6), 1648-1668.
Tolmacz, R., Efrati, Y., and Ben-David, B. M. (2016), The Sense of Relational Entitlement Among Adolescents toward their Parents (SREap) - Testing an adaptation of the SRE. J. Adolescence. 53, 127-140.
Tolmacz, R., Mahajna, S., & Efrati, Y. (2017), ʻThe Sense of Entitlement in Romantic Relationships: Ethnic and Religious Aspects.ʼ Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 20 (8), 728-740.
Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016), ʻDiscriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed Remedies.ʼ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (1), 119-134.
Wood, J. T. (2004), ʻMonsters and Victims: Male felons’ Accounts of Intimate Partner violence.ʼ Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21 (5), 555-576.
 

  • تاریخ دریافت 08 دی 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری 06 بهمن 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش 06 خرداد 1403